So does it means that it is allowed to equal itself for the half order as well?
Have you asked yourself if there is a function equal itself only every even order or every nth order throughout its multiples?
See the behavior of the following functions where n \in \Bbb Z
1) D^{n}_x( e^x)=e^x (neutral function of integer-order Diffrentiation)
2) D^{2n}_x\left(\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2}\right )=\frac{e^x+e^{-x}}{2} (neutral function of only even-order Diffrentiation)
3) D^{3n}_x\left(\frac {e^x+e^{\omega x}+e^{\omega^2 x}}{3}\right)=\frac {e^x+e^{\omega x}+e^{\omega^2 x}}{3} where \omega=e^{\frac{\pi i}{3}} (neutral function of only multiples-of-3-order Diffrentiation)
4) D^{4n}_x\left(\frac {e^x+e^{-x}+e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{4}\right)=\frac {e^x+e^{-x}+e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{4} (neutral function of only multiples-of-4-order Diffrentiation)
and so on...
These belong to exponential k step \sum_{k \in \Bbb Z}\frac{x^{nk}}{(nk)!} any every function of them can not equal itself with an order out of its nth order and its multiples.
(Exponential k step has a formula for generating any k step , \sum_{k \in \Bbb Z}\frac{x^{nk}}{(nk)!}=\frac1k\sum_{j=1}^{k}e^{r^j_k x} where r_k=e^{\frac{2\pi i}{k}})
Now let us rearrange the functions in other patern.
In the following steps I will use Mittag-Leffler function instead of k step sum but with little change as:
E_{\alpha}(x^{\alpha})=\sum_{k \in \Bbb Z}\frac{x^{\alpha k}}{(\alpha k)!} , \alpha >0 \tag 1
1) For \alpha=1 , E_{1}(x)=e^x
2) For \alpha =2 , E_{2}(x^2)=\frac12(e^x+e^{-x})
3) For \alpha =4 , E_{4}(x^4)=\frac14(e^x+e^{-x}+e^{ix}+e^{-ix})
4) For \alpha =8 , E_{8}(x^8)=\frac18(e^x+e^{-x}+e^{ix}+e^{-ix}+e^{(i+1)x}+e^{(i-1)x}+e^{(-i+1)x}+e^{(-i-1)x})
and so on every 2^n itration
We can obseve two relations
E_{2\alpha}(x^{2\alpha})=\frac12\left(E_{\alpha}(x^{\alpha})+E_{\alpha}\left((-1)^{\frac1{\alpha}}x^{\alpha}\right)\right) \tag 2
and
E_{\alpha}(x^{\alpha})=E_{2\alpha}(x^{2\alpha})+D_x^{\alpha}\left(E_{2\alpha}(x^{2\alpha})\right) \tag 3
For example:
E_1(x)=E_2(x^2)+D^1_x(E_2(x^2))
=\frac12(e^x+e^{-x})+D^1_x\left(\frac12(e^x+e^{-x})\right)
=\frac12(e^x+e^{-x})+\frac12(e^x-e^{-x})=e^x
Now if we let \alpha = \frac12 then
E_{1/2}(x^{1/2})=E_1(x)+D_x^{1/2}(E_1(x))
=e^x+D_x^{1/2}(e^x)
From eq(1) we have E_{1/2}(x^{1/2})=\sum_{k \in \Bbb Z}\frac{x^{\frac12 k}}{(\frac12 k)!}=\cdots +\frac{x^{-1}}{-1!}+\frac{x^{-1/2}}{-1/2!}+\frac{x^0}{0!}+\frac{x^{1/2}}{1/2!}+\frac{x^1}{1!}+\frac{x^{3/2}}{3/2!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+\frac{x^{5/2}}{5/2!}+\cdots
Then
e^x+D_x^{1/2}(e^x)=\left(\cdots +\frac{x^{-1}}{-1!}+\frac{x^0}{0!}+\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+\cdots\right)+\left(\cdots +\frac{x^{-1/2}}{-1/2!}+\frac{x^{1/2}}{1/2!}+\frac{x^{3/2}}{3/2!}+\frac{x^{5/2}}{5/2!}+\cdots\right)
Therefore
D_x^{1/2}(e^x)=\cdots +\frac{x^{-5/2}}{-5/2!}+\frac{x^{-3/2}}{-3/2!}+\frac{x^{-1/2}}{-1/2!}+\frac{x^{1/2}}{1/2!}+\frac{x^{3/2}}{3/2!}+\frac{x^{5/2}}{5/2!}+\cdots
Unfortunately the half-order differentiation of e^x is undefined by this series expansion.
AN OTHER PROOF
Let us assume that D_x^{1/2}(e^{ax})=a^{1/2}e^{ax} that means:
D_x^{1/2}\left(\lim_{n \to \infty}(1+\frac1n)^{n(ax)}\right)=a^{1/2}\left(\lim_{n \to \infty}(1+\frac1n)^{n(ax)}\right)
And also by exponential property it can be written as:
D_x^{1/2}\left(\lim_{n \to \infty}(1+\frac anx)^{n}\right)=a^{1/2}\left(\lim_{n \to \infty}(1+\frac anx)^{n}\right)
Now the equation is under power role which seems to be ok for any integer-order differentioation.
Because n is constant so it can be any positive real vlaue, and we expect the same result for any value of n.
Then for the first test (n=1),
D_x^{1/2}\left((1+ ax)^{(1)}\right)=\frac{a^{1/2}}{\Gamma(3/2)}(1+ax)^{(\frac12)}
But if we solve it directly we get,
D_x^{1/2}\left(1+ ax\right)=\frac{x^{-1/2}}{\Gamma(1/2)}+a\frac{x^{1/2}}{\Gamma(3/2)}
And we can simply see that,
\frac{a^{1/2}}{\Gamma(3/2)}(1+ax)^{(\frac12)} \neq \frac{x^{-1/2}}{\Gamma(1/2)}+a\frac{x^{1/2}}{\Gamma(3/2)}
Hence the first test "n=1" has failed.
FINALLY
Nevertheless there is a relation which says
D_x^{\alpha}(e^x)=e^x \cdot D_x^{\alpha}(e^x)|_{x=0}
Which I will prove it in one of the next posts (If God wills).
No comments:
Post a Comment